Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement phaseAngleClock extension for 2 and 3 windings transformers #45

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 13, 2020

Conversation

mathbagu
Copy link

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use '[x]' to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using '#XXX' and skip the rest
#18

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Feature

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
The phaseAngleClock extension doesn't exist

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
The phaseAngleClock extension is available for both 2 and 3 windings transformer.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration guide has been updated in the github wiki (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:
This PR doesn't fix the second part of the issue #18 that I will implement in another PR. The second part is not directly bounded to this evolution and is quiet hard to port in C++ due to the usage of raw types in Java (TapChanger). I don't know yet how to implement it.

(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)

Signed-off-by: Mathieu BAGUE <mathieu.bague@rte-france.com>
@mathbagu mathbagu added this to In progress in IIDM v1.0 via automation Mar 11, 2020
@mathbagu mathbagu moved this from In progress to Review in IIDM v1.0 Mar 11, 2020
Signed-off-by: Mathieu BAGUE <mathieu.bague@rte-france.com>
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 13, 2020

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities (and Security Hotspot 0 Security Hotspots to review)
Code Smell A 12 Code Smells

51.9% 51.9% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@mathbagu mathbagu merged commit 584393d into master Mar 13, 2020
IIDM v1.0 automation moved this from Review to Done Mar 13, 2020
@mathbagu mathbagu deleted the feature/v1.0-issue#18 branch March 13, 2020 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
IIDM v1.0
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants