Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: Custom config #56

Merged
merged 19 commits into from Jun 28, 2017

Conversation

rkostrzewski
Copy link
Collaborator

@rkostrzewski rkostrzewski commented May 24, 2017

Basically this adds support for custom webpack configuration transforms via preact.config.js file.

To do:

  • inform user when config provided via CLI was not found
  • webpack helpers
  • babel preset for preact-cli allow .babelrc & extend from existing config
  • update readme

Example config setting custom template:

import path from 'path'

export default (config, env, webpack) => {
	const htmlWebpackPlugin = config.plugins.filter(p => p.constructor && p.constructor.name === 'HtmlWebpackPlugin')[0]
	htmlWebpackPlugin.options.template = '!!ejs-loader!' + path.resolve(__dirname, './template.html')
}

Function exported in preact.config.js would take following parameters:

  • config - original webpack config
  • env - copy of CLI options (e.g. cwd, production)
  • webpack - imported webpack object from webpack blocks (for using webpack plugins & keeping same webpack version as preact-cli uses)

@developit, @cedric-marcone you had an idea to include .babelrc provided in folder.
I don't think it's a good idea without some changes. Current config has some great plugins (e.g. 'babel-plugin-transform-react-constant-elements', 'babel-plugin-transform-react-remove-prop-types') - which would be lost. If there's new cool plugin increasing performance by 100% which the end user doesn't know about he won't be included if preact-cli decides to add it.

I think babel preset that would be preact-cli specific would solve that issue. What do you think?

@thangngoc89 you had an idea to create some helpers, did you have anything specific in mind? I fully agree modifying webpack config is rather painful experience.

My ideas include:

  • plugin selector by name (sth like in code above),
  • loader selector as loaders could be hidden in module.loaders & module.rules and use, loader, & loaders inside the rule (I guess it could be replaced with sticking to one way of writing rules in original config)

Anywho, waiting for your opinions.

@thangngoc89
Copy link
Collaborator

@rkostrzewski

I'm using Webpack 1 terms, but Webpack 2 is pretty much similar

Most of the time, I usually need to do these thing with Webpack config:

  • Add/Remove plugins: adding is easy with Object spread but removing is annoying, checking for instance of everywhere
  • Add/Remove loaders for each file type: this is pretty hard to work with and most of the time, I wish I could just overwrite loader config for a specific file type than manipulating them.

@developit
Copy link
Member

Agreed with point about babelrc - I was actually thinking we'd manually parse it and apply the changes, but that might be somewhat difficult. Curious to hear your thoughts around that.

Maybe we should provide a helper (3rd arg?) for the config mutation function to be able to find a given plugin? like plugin(config, 'HtmlWebpackPlugin').blah = 'foo'? aaaand you already had that idea. I'm getting old you know.

@developit developit mentioned this pull request May 25, 2017
@rkostrzewski
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@developit we're in the luck - babel-loader allows passing presets and babel-config already conforms to babel-preset format.

I've created some helpers - the idea behind them was that given rule index and loader index you can do pretty much everywhere (modify, remove, add).

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ export default (env, options={}) => ({
loose: true,
modules: options.modules || false,
uglify: true,
browsers: env.browsers ? env.browsers.split() : [
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

env.browsers was never passed here, in babel-preset env argument means something different so I've removed it

@@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ export default env => {
pkg = readJson(manifest) || {};
return !!(pkg.module || pkg['jsnext:main']);
},
babelrc: false,
...createBabelConfig(env)
babelrc: true,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can't have this. This is the reason for #9. Even though it's been set to false, it wasn't actually making it to the babel compiler.

I have a PR incoming for this.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, nah - I've checked this it works for the cases specified in #9, the exlude: [] messes things up - babelrc is innocent 😛.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I forgot to come back here and update this comment. 👍

Copy link
Member

@developit developit May 29, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i merged the other one before reading this 🤓

@rkostrzewski rkostrzewski changed the title [WIP] feature: Custom config feature: Custom config May 29, 2017
…onfig

# Conflicts:
#	src/lib/webpack-config.js
@hassanbazzi
Copy link
Member

Good stuff dude!

@lwakefield lwakefield mentioned this pull request Jun 10, 2017
…onfig

# Conflicts:
#	src/commands/build.js
#	src/commands/watch.js
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ export default {
'bundle.js': { size: 18460 },
'bundle.js.map': { size: 101500 },
'route-home.chunk.*.js': { size: 1020 },
'route-home.chunk.*.js.map': { size: 4980 },
'route-home.chunk.*.js.map': { size: 4283 },
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Babel query got smaller (using preset now rather than passing options object).

@developit developit added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Jun 27, 2017
@hassanbazzi hassanbazzi merged commit 7347266 into preactjs:master Jun 28, 2017
@lukeed
Copy link
Member

lukeed commented Jun 28, 2017

The most anticipated PR of the repo has landed 🛩

@rkostrzewski rkostrzewski deleted the feature/custom-config branch July 9, 2017 19:26
@andywillis
Copy link

This is great because I just started to use Preact and needed to proxy to Express like I could with CRA. Couldn't figure it out until I read this thread. Thanks! @lukeed

@AlexChalk
Copy link

@andywillis How did you manage it?

@andywillis
Copy link

andywillis commented Aug 29, 2017

@adc17, I used a preact.config.js file with the following (you should adjust it for your requirements):

module.exports = function (config) {
  if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') {
    config.devServer.proxy = [
      {
        // proxy requests matching a pattern:
        path: '/entries',

        // where to proxy to:
        target: 'http://localhost:3001',

      }
    ];
  }
};

There's more information/a better example here.

@Luxcium Luxcium mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2018
@josmithua
Copy link

Does this support parcel as well as webpack, or just webpack? I can't get it working with parcel...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants