Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving recent changes (PaStiX, .DEB packages) to develop #80

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Feb 8, 2022

Conversation

boris-martin
Copy link
Collaborator

Both these features were developed on branch 2.17. I updated the packaging for 2.19.

MakisH and others added 11 commits November 10, 2021 18:02
Co-authored-by: Gerasimos Chourdakis <chourdak@in.tum.de>
Co-authored-by: Kyle Davis <kyle.davis@ipvs.uni-stuttgart.de>
Added support for PaStiX.

Currently uses an alternate Makefile. Future plan includes a unified makefile with a simple option instead.

Co-authored-by: Kyle Davis <kyle.davis@ipvs.uni-stuttgart.de>
In the future, we aim for a unique Makefile
Copy link
Member

@MakisH MakisH left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I ran the perpendicular-flap OpenFOAM-CalculiX with this branch and everything else from develop. It completed and the results looked reasonable.

Makefile_i8_PaStiX Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Gerasimos Chourdakis <makishourdakis@gmail.com>
packaging/calculix-precice2_2.19-1_amd64/DEBIAN/control Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pastix_pre_build.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@MakisH MakisH merged commit e03bde2 into develop Feb 8, 2022
@MakisH MakisH deleted the debian_pastix_to_develop branch February 8, 2022 19:10
@MakisH MakisH mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants