Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Create demo using the monix.eval.Task effect #3

Closed
gvolpe opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Create demo using the monix.eval.Task effect #3

gvolpe opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@gvolpe
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@gvolpe
Copy link
Member

gvolpe commented Jun 13, 2017

The current demo is implemented using cats.effect.IO. Add a new MonixDemo to demonstrate that it's possible to use a different effect of choice.
@gvolpe gvolpe self-assigned this Jun 13, 2017
@gvolpe gvolpe mentioned this issue Jun 16, 2017
Closed
gvolpe added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2017
@gvolpe
#3 Implementing Monix Task Demo.
0253880
gvolpe added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2017
@gvolpe
#15 bindQueue methods added. Examples are not compiling yet because i…
3a02b23 
…t depends on model changes regarding #3 in a different branch.
gvolpe added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2017
@gvolpe
#3 Commented Monix Task demo to merge it to master until I get an ans…
30c66e4 
…wer in the Monix Gitter channel.
gvolpe added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2017
@gvolpe
Examples/monix task (#17)
1c9b836 
* #3 Demo has been made Generic. MonixEffectScheduler has been created. However, the MonixTaskDemo has left commented until I get an answer in the Monix Gitter channel regarding the implementation of cats.effect.Effect[Task].
gvolpe added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2017
@gvolpe
#3 Monix Task demo now working.
7d3e144
gvolpe added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2017
@gvolpe
Merge pull request #19 from gvolpe/feature/monix-task
7f48bd7 
#3 Monix Task demo now working.
gvolpe added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2017
@gvolpe
#3 Using Await.result to block instead of runSyncMaybe.
afd403d
@gvolpe gvolpe closed this as completed Jun 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@gvolpe gvolpe

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@gvolpe