Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Hide PTM in Configurator UI #7261

Closed
amyreye opened this issue Apr 5, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Hide PTM in Configurator UI #7261

amyreye opened this issue Apr 5, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@amyreye
Copy link
Contributor

amyreye commented Apr 5, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Please hide PTM (Precision Time Measurement) from the Configurator UI, by updating the XSD.

    <xs:element name="PTM" type="Boolean" default="y" minOccurs="0">
      <xs:annotation acrn:title="Precision Time Measurement" acrn:applicable-vms="pre-launched, post-launched" acrn:views="advanced">
@amyreye amyreye added the status: new The issue status: new for creation label Apr 5, 2022
@NanlinXie
Copy link
Contributor

[External_System_ID] ACRN-8731

@NanlinXie NanlinXie removed the status: new The issue status: new for creation label Apr 7, 2022
liuhang-bit added a commit to liuhang-bit/acrn-hypervisor that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2022
@liuhang-bit
config tool: hide PTM in schema
8ef687c 
change acrn:view attribute to ""

Tracked-On: projectacrn#7261
Signed-off-by: hangliu1 <hang1.liu@linux.intel.com>
@liuhang-bit liuhang-bit mentioned this issue Apr 11, 2022
Merged
acrnsi-robot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2022
@liuhang-bit @acrnsi-robot
config tool: hide PTM in schema
0e4a94f 
change acrn:view attribute to ""

Tracked-On: #7261
Signed-off-by: hangliu1 <hang1.liu@linux.intel.com>
@NanlinXie
Copy link
Contributor

Closed with no regression issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@NanlinXie @amyreye