Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle cases where the deprecated field value is not a string or symb… #2042

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 18, 2018

Conversation

cbeer
Copy link
Member

@cbeer cbeer commented Dec 18, 2018

…ol either

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.002%) to 94.516% when pulling 9e573ca on release-6.x-field-values into 50162d7 on release-6.x.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.002%) to 94.516% when pulling 9e573ca on release-6.x-field-values into 50162d7 on release-6.x.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 18, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.003%) to 94.518% when pulling b004b54 on release-6.x-field-values into 50162d7 on release-6.x.

@jcoyne jcoyne merged commit e47a21d into release-6.x Dec 18, 2018
@jcoyne jcoyne deleted the release-6.x-field-values branch January 19, 2019 04:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants