Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding support for resolver protocol #102

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Sep 16, 2021

Conversation

Mzack9999
Copy link
Member

@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 commented Aug 26, 2021

echo example.com | dnsx -r tcp:127.0.0.1:54 -json -silent

@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 added the Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes. label Aug 26, 2021
@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 self-assigned this Aug 26, 2021
@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 linked an issue Aug 26, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 linked an issue Aug 30, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 added the Status: Review Needed The issue has a PR attached to it which needs to be reviewed label Sep 16, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ehsandeep ehsandeep left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works with all protocols

chaos -silent -d hackerone.com | ./dnsx -r tcp:1.1.1.1 -silent
chaos -silent -d hackerone.com | ./dnsx -r udp:1.1.1.1 -silent
chaos -silent -d hackerone.com | ./dnsx -r doh:https://dns.google/dns-query:post -silent
chaos -silent -d hackerone.com | ./dnsx -r doh:https://doh.opendns.com/dns-query:post -silent

@ehsandeep ehsandeep added Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed. and removed Status: Review Needed The issue has a PR attached to it which needs to be reviewed labels Sep 16, 2021
@ehsandeep ehsandeep merged commit 0cb41bf into dev Sep 16, 2021
@ehsandeep ehsandeep deleted the 98-feature-custom-port-in-resolvers branch September 16, 2021 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed. Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature] Supporting custom protocol and port for resolvers [Feature] Add support for DOH
2 participants