You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Occasionally the client will upload a file with mime type: "application/octet-stream" even though FITS correctly determines its mime to be "video/webm". Since CurationConcerns and Hydra-Derivatives depend on the original file mime type, we should update the original file with the mime type found by FITS.
I had not included mime_type as a default property of characterization.
The mime_type update could be done as a consequence of characterization. The characterization will set properties on the generic file. So the generic file could have a property mime_type that has a different response from the mime_type function of the file it contains. I can see how this could be a problem.
Should attempting to update the content file be done as part of the stock characterization? if the generic file's mime_type property was delegated to the original_file, would calling gf.mime_type="application/new-mime" update the original_file?
Occasionally the client will upload a file with mime type: "application/octet-stream" even though FITS correctly determines its mime to be "video/webm". Since CurationConcerns and Hydra-Derivatives depend on the original file mime type, we should update the original file with the mime type found by FITS.
We don't want to have this situation:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: