Add documentation for recording rule backfiller #8674
Conversation
Signed-off-by: jessicagreben <jessicagrebens@gmail.com>
docs/storage.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ### Usage | ||
|
|
||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This copy and paste seems fragile, I would remove it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe say: To see all the options, use promtool tsdb create-blocks-from rules --help
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah i was thinking the same. will change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could setup auto-generated one, but if we do, let's make Pr at some point for all commands (:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bwplotka Is there somewhere we already have the auto-generated one setup? Or would that be something new? If we want to proceed with that, is it worth creating an issue for it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks a lot! It looks great, but I agree with @roidelapluie suggestions. Let's address them and then LGTM 🚀
docs/storage.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ### Usage | ||
|
|
||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could setup auto-generated one, but if we do, let's make Pr at some point for all commands (:
Signed-off-by: jessicagreben <jessicagrebens@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: jessicagreben <jessicagrebens@gmail.com>
|
Thanks! |
This PR adds documentation for Issue #11 and #8667.