Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GCI] Standardised Blur module code comments #1347

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jan 1, 2020
Merged

[GCI] Standardised Blur module code comments #1347

merged 10 commits into from
Jan 1, 2020

Conversation

harshkhandeparkar
Copy link
Member

@harshkhandeparkar harshkhandeparkar commented Dec 9, 2019

Fixes #1342 (<=== Replace 0000 with the Issue Number)

Make sure these boxes are checked before your pull request (PR) is ready to be reviewed and merged. Thanks!

  • tests pass -- look for a green checkbox ✔️ a few minutes after opening your PR -- or run tests locally with npm test
  • code is in uniquely-named feature branch and has no merge conflicts
  • PR is descriptively titled
  • ask @publiclab/is-reviewers for help, in a comment below
  • Insert-step functionality is working correct as expected.

We're happy to help you get this ready -- don't be afraid to ask for help, and don't be discouraged if your tests fail at first!

If tests do fail, click on the red X to learn why by reading the logs.

Please be sure you've reviewed our contribution guidelines at https://publiclab.org/contributing-to-public-lab-software
Please make sure to get at least two reviews before asking for merging the PR as that would make the PR more reliable on our part
Thanks!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 9, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1347 into main will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1347   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.12%   66.12%           
=======================================
  Files         125      125           
  Lines        2571     2571           
  Branches      404      404           
=======================================
  Hits         1700     1700           
  Misses        871      871
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/modules/Blur/Blur.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

@harshkhandeparkar
Copy link
Member Author

@SidharthBansal please try to get these PRs merged quickly. I don't think I will be free next month so I want to complete as many tasks as possible this month itself. Thanks!

@Divy123
Copy link
Member

Divy123 commented Dec 9, 2019

@harshkhandeparkar I will be reviewing PRs from next week. But please be patient, as we have to make it feasible for all the mentors and participants to participate smoothly, we will try our level best. Next thing is I think Siddharth will be doing it whenever he will be here,and we have to make it open for all. So we cannot make it a personalized experience for someone.

@harshkhandeparkar
Copy link
Member Author

harshkhandeparkar commented Dec 9, 2019

@Divy123 yeah sure. I am in a hurry because the task I have already accepted is about to hit the deadline and also I hadn't expected it to take such a long time. Sorry if I am causing inconvenience to others. If I had known that I would have to split this task or if the task had been split earlier, I would have left it to claim at the end or let someone else claim it. Sorry still.

@harshkhandeparkar
Copy link
Member Author

My school schedule is going to be busy now on. This is the only month when I got a bit of free time. Otherwise, I wouldn't even have participated.

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

I can review your prs tomorrow. I am busy today. He is assigned one hall-of-fame task. I asked him to divide it into multiple PRs so that we can review it easy.
Thanks all of you

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

Codeclimate is failing please check

Copy link
Member

@SidharthBansal SidharthBansal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉

@harshkhandeparkar
Copy link
Member Author

Is there a reason why you closed the PR?

@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

SidharthBansal commented Dec 9, 2019 via email

@SidharthBansal SidharthBansal reopened this Dec 9, 2019
@SidharthBansal
Copy link
Member

SidharthBansal commented Dec 9, 2019 via email

@harshkhandeparkar
Copy link
Member Author

harshkhandeparkar commented Dec 9, 2019 via email

@harshkhandeparkar
Copy link
Member Author

@jywarren can this and the other comments GCI PRs be merged now?

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

Yes! Let's rebase and we should be good to go! Thanks!!

@harshkhandeparkar
Copy link
Member Author

harshkhandeparkar commented Dec 21, 2019 via email

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

jywarren commented Jan 1, 2020

Hmm, do you know what these errors are? Thanks!

@harshkhandeparkar
Copy link
Member Author

harshkhandeparkar commented Jan 1, 2020 via email

@keshav234156
Copy link
Member

@jywarren it seem like it was some travis fault.Now it's fine.

@jywarren
Copy link
Member

jywarren commented Jan 1, 2020

Looking to merge this one next after updating branch!

Copy link
Member

@jywarren jywarren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome!!!!

@jywarren jywarren merged commit 0bf1780 into publiclab:main Jan 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Standardise Blur module code comments
5 participants