Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sdk/python] Fix comment about ROOT_STACK_RESOURCE #13323

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 30, 2023
Merged

Conversation

justinvp
Copy link
Member

Looks like this was copied from the Node.js SDK. It should be ROOT_STACK_RESOURCE not rootStackResource for Python.

Looks like this was copied from the Node.js SDK. It should be `ROOT_STACK_RESOURCE` not `rootStackResource` for Python.
@justinvp justinvp added the impact/no-changelog-required This issue doesn't require a CHANGELOG update label Jun 29, 2023
@pulumi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Changelog

[uncommitted] (2023-06-29)

@justinvp justinvp requested a review from a team June 29, 2023 19:28
@abhinav
Copy link
Contributor

abhinav commented Jun 29, 2023

=== Failed
=== FAIL: cmd/pulumi TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig (0.00s)
    new_test.go:330: 
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new_test.go:330
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	A project with this name already exists
        	Test:       	TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig

=== FAIL: cmd/pulumi TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig (re-run 1) (0.28s)
    new_test.go:330: 
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new_test.go:330
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	A project with this name already exists
        	Test:       	TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig

@abhinav
Copy link
Contributor

abhinav commented Jun 29, 2023

Passes locally but something's iffy in tests. I'll make the test randomize the project name.

abhinav added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig appears to be broken on master:

```
=== Failed
=== FAIL: cmd/pulumi TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig (0.00s)
    new_test.go:330:
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new_test.go:330
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	A project with this name already exists
        	Test:       	TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig

=== FAIL: cmd/pulumi TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig (re-run 1) (0.28s)
    new_test.go:330:
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new_test.go:330
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	A project with this name already exists
        	Test:       	TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig
```

As seen in #13323 and the attempts to land #13322.

To reduce likelihood of "name already exists" errors,
generate a random name for all tests where the name is currently based
on the name of the temporary directory.

Also, change all manually managed temporary directories
(with an unchecked error) to `t.TempDir()` -- making the testing package
handle cleanup of the temporary directories.
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
13325: test: Attempt to fix TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig r=abhinav a=abhinav

TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig appears to be broken on master:

```
=== Failed
=== FAIL: cmd/pulumi TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig (0.00s)
    new_test.go:330:
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new_test.go:330
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	A project with this name already exists
        	Test:       	TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig

=== FAIL: cmd/pulumi TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig (re-run 1) (0.28s)
    new_test.go:330:
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new_test.go:330
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	A project with this name already exists
        	Test:       	TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig
```

As seen in #13323 and the attempts to land #13322.

To reduce likelihood of "name already exists" errors,
generate a random name for all tests where the name is currently based
on the name of the temporary directory.

Also, change all manually managed temporary directories
(with an unchecked error) to `t.TempDir()` -- making the testing package
handle cleanup of the temporary directories.

Note: The randomly generated directory name is used
only in cases where the name of the directory was used as input
in the rest of the test.

Co-authored-by: Abhinav Gupta <abhinav@pulumi.com>
abhinav added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig appears to be broken on master:

```
=== Failed
=== FAIL: cmd/pulumi TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig (0.00s)
    new_test.go:330:
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new_test.go:330
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	A project with this name already exists
        	Test:       	TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig

=== FAIL: cmd/pulumi TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig (re-run 1) (0.28s)
    new_test.go:330:
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new_test.go:330
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	A project with this name already exists
        	Test:       	TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig
```

As seen in #13323 and the attempts to land #13322.

To reduce likelihood of "name already exists" errors,
generate a random name for all tests where the name is currently based
on the name of the temporary directory.

Also, change all manually managed temporary directories
(with an unchecked error) to `t.TempDir()` -- making the testing package
handle cleanup of the temporary directories.
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
13325: test: Attempt to fix TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig r=abhinav a=abhinav

TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig appears to be broken on master:

```
=== Failed
=== FAIL: cmd/pulumi TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig (0.00s)
    new_test.go:330:
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new_test.go:330
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	A project with this name already exists
        	Test:       	TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig

=== FAIL: cmd/pulumi TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig (re-run 1) (0.28s)
    new_test.go:330:
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new_test.go:330
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	A project with this name already exists
        	Test:       	TestCreatingProjectWithEmptyConfig
```

As seen in #13323 and the attempts to land #13322.

To reduce likelihood of "name already exists" errors,
generate a random name for all tests where the name is currently based
on the name of the temporary directory.

Also, change all manually managed temporary directories
(with an unchecked error) to `t.TempDir()` -- making the testing package
handle cleanup of the temporary directories.

Note: The randomly generated directory name is used
only in cases where the name of the directory was used as input
in the rest of the test.

Co-authored-by: Abhinav Gupta <abhinav@pulumi.com>
@abhinav
Copy link
Contributor

abhinav commented Jun 29, 2023

bors merge

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
13265: Fix isInstance methods on generated provider types in the nodejs sdks r=abhinav a=Frassle

<!--- 
Thanks so much for your contribution! If this is your first time contributing, please ensure that you have read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) documentation.
-->

# Description

<!--- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. -->

Fixes #12584

## Checklist

- [x] I have run `make tidy` to update any new dependencies
- [x] I have run `make lint` to verify my code passes the lint check
  - [ ] I have formatted my code using `gofumpt`

<!--- Please provide details if the checkbox below is to be left unchecked. -->
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
<!--- 
User-facing changes require a CHANGELOG entry.
-->
- [x] I have run `make changelog` and committed the `changelog/pending/<file>` documenting my change
<!--
If the change(s) in this PR is a modification of an existing call to the Pulumi Cloud,
then the service should honor older versions of the CLI where this change would not exist.
You must then bump the API version in /pkg/backend/httpstate/client/api.go, as well as add
it to the service.
-->
- [ ] Yes, there are changes in this PR that warrants bumping the Pulumi Cloud API version
  <!-- `@Pulumi` employees: If yes, you must submit corresponding changes in the service repo. -->


13316: Test duplicate outputs r=abhinav a=Frassle

<!--- 
Thanks so much for your contribution! If this is your first time contributing, please ensure that you have read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) documentation.
-->

# Description

<!--- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. -->

Regression test to cover #9411

## Checklist

- [x] I have run `make tidy` to update any new dependencies
- [x] I have run `make lint` to verify my code passes the lint check
  - [x] I have formatted my code using `gofumpt`

<!--- Please provide details if the checkbox below is to be left unchecked. -->
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
<!--- 
User-facing changes require a CHANGELOG entry.
-->
- [ ] I have run `make changelog` and committed the `changelog/pending/<file>` documenting my change
<!--
If the change(s) in this PR is a modification of an existing call to the Pulumi Cloud,
then the service should honor older versions of the CLI where this change would not exist.
You must then bump the API version in /pkg/backend/httpstate/client/api.go, as well as add
it to the service.
-->
- [ ] Yes, there are changes in this PR that warrants bumping the Pulumi Cloud API version
  <!-- `@Pulumi` employees: If yes, you must submit corresponding changes in the service repo. -->


13323: [sdk/python] Fix comment about `ROOT_STACK_RESOURCE` r=abhinav a=justinvp

Looks like this was copied from the Node.js SDK. It should be `ROOT_STACK_RESOURCE` not `rootStackResource` for Python.

13326: ci: Include Go and NodeJS hosts in unit tests r=abhinav a=abhinav

The CI test matrix generator expects every module that we want to test
to be provided explicitly.
Since the Go and Node hosts became independent Go modules,
we haven't been running their unit tests in CI.

Fortunately, the tests still pass today,
but we need to include these in the build.


13327: ci/build-binaries: Don't enable cgo for Darwin r=abhinav a=abhinav

Previously, it was necessary to enable cgo
and use the system's DNS resolver on macOS.
In Go 1.20, the `net` package was rewritten
to not use cgo at all,
so CGO_ENABLED no longer has any effect there.

In fact, ever since 3898600,
this setting has been meaningless
because we've been building Darwin binaries
on Ubuntu machines (so cgo can't be enabled anyway).

This commit just deletes this now-unused block.


Co-authored-by: Fraser Waters <fraser@pulumi.com>
Co-authored-by: Justin Van Patten <jvp@justinvp.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhinav Gupta <abhinav@pulumi.com>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jun 30, 2023

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot merged commit 11f3f1d into master Jun 30, 2023
47 of 48 checks passed
@bors bors bot deleted the justin/pyaliascomment branch June 30, 2023 00:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
impact/no-changelog-required This issue doesn't require a CHANGELOG update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants