Conversation
40f7508
to
8c09c09
Compare
/retest |
see #171 for previous comments and context |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got one nit but other than that everything looks good
Any chance you could squash the commits a little bit? Don't tend to like fixup
and WIP
in commit messages if possible, commits should be a logical history of the functional changes by the time they hit master
|
||
var key = types.NamespacedName{Name: "example", Namespace: "default"} | ||
var expectedRequest = reconcile.Request{NamespacedName: key} | ||
|
||
const timeout = time.Second * 5 | ||
const consistentTimeout = 1 * time.Second |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit but we normally have this called consistentlyTimeout
in our other tests
8c09c09
to
8849fb8
Compare
Fixed up that last suggestion and pruned the history |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Also remove a test that checked on running disabled CGT, since it is now a panic
8849fb8
to
35ae026
Compare
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (I think). There's one comment that I believe is incorrect (or the test is incorrect 😛)
/retest |
Due to thumbs for fingers, I managed to close the last PR by merging it into another branch
This PR adds the gittrack mode flag and adds tests for watches being disabled when handling them is disabled