Make NodeJob compliant with the storage interface

[liamhuber]

What happened is that I merged the NodeJob branch into its parent storage branch before making sure the NodeJob branch had pulled in its most-up-to-date parent. I didn't notice the incompatibility because the CI was broken due to missing dependencies. Obviously with broken CI I should have been more careful, but also this is sort of a chance I took when I chose to merge anything to anywhere else when the CI was not passing.

[github-actions]

👈 Launch a binder notebook on branch pyiron/pyiron_workflow/patch_jobs_in_storage

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for 648cfdc1	✅ 78.57%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (648cfdc)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (3f0f8d9)	3061	2655	86.74%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#209)	14	11	78.57%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation}

Footnotes

1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct. ↩

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB