Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In PARTISN, energy-dependent quantities are ordered from high-energy to low-energy. I could not find explicit documentation of this, but I was about to confirm this by experiment. I ran transport problems with source intensity only in the last energy group (i.e. the lowest energy group in PARTISN), and confirmed that fluxes in all other groups were zero. I also did the reverse --- only flux in the first group --- and confirmed that particles were indeed downscattering in the other groups.
In PyNE we have been using the opposite convention --- low-energy to high-energy --- consistent with MCNP. The PR fixes PARTISN functionality to be consistent with the rest of PyNE. For unit tests, I was able to simply reverse the order of input spectra, minimizing what needed to be changed.