Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set max_rounds to an incredibly large number #8275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 20, 2020

Conversation

uranusjr
Copy link
Member

We really don’t want to raise ResolutionTooDeep yet since the metric is not very useful. Try to avoid this until we come up with a better method to count.

@uranusjr uranusjr added skip news Does not need a NEWS file entry (eg: trivial changes) C: new resolver labels May 20, 2020
@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member

This fails on Python 2.7. :(

I second @pfmoore's suggestion of 2000000!

@uranusjr
Copy link
Member Author

Ah because range() (or even xrange()) on Python 2 does not take long. Let’d go with 2000000 then.

We really don't want to raise ResolutionTooDeep yet since the metric is
not very useful. Try to avoid this until we come up with a better method
to count.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
skip news Does not need a NEWS file entry (eg: trivial changes)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants