test coverage to 98% on network

[jlaura]

This is just on network.py. Tests are running in ~14 seconds for this module. The test case is the same as geodanet.

Updated coverage information:

$ nosetests --with-coverage --cover-package=pysal.network
.............
Name                     Stmts   Miss  Cover   Missing
------------------------------------------------------
pysal.network                1      0   100%
pysal.network.analysis     103     85    17%   10-30, 33-34, 37-41, 44-47, 59-64, 67-76, 85-94, 97-106, 117-125, 128-134, 137-144, 147-158, 174-186
pysal.network.network      495     12    98%   271, 278, 286, 692-694, 1065, 1069, 1129, 1163, 1166-1167
pysal.network.util          97     41    58%   13-30, 79-83, 130-138, 141-158
------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                      696    138    80%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 13 tests in 13.383s

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+1.54%) to 85.81% when pulling bbd0e41 on jlaura:network_docs into 43babec on pysal:network_docs.

[dfolch]

Is from __future__ import division needed for the tests to pass? Will this mess with the 2 to 3 conversion work that is being done separately?

[jlaura]

That import is 2/3 compatible and is required to make the division behave the same.

[jlaura]

The PR has been updated with 100% code coverage on network/utils. A few notes:

• using a relative import because I am 100% sure that the tests will always live within the network directory
• removed a lot of unused code from utils to avoid redundant testing
• taking ~ 14 seconds on my box

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+1.69%) to 85.97% when pulling 29c902d on jlaura:network_docs into 43babec on pysal:network_docs.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+1.69%) to 85.97% when pulling 29c902d on jlaura:network_docs into 43babec on pysal:network_docs.