Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PySAL+ optional testing matrix #833

Closed
wants to merge 30 commits into from
Closed

PySAL+ optional testing matrix #833

wants to merge 30 commits into from

Conversation

ljwolf
Copy link
Member

@ljwolf ljwolf commented Jul 16, 2016

This sets up a multi-environment test matrix for PySAL using an environment variable, PYSAL_PLUS & is the remaining blocker for #829. It was rebased from #830.

If PYSAL_PLUS, we include everything in requirements_plus.txt in the testing environment. This way, if we have numba versions of computational functions, tabular methods, etc, these get tested.

In theory, these should also be added to the setup.py extras_require flag, if we want to appropriately incorporate this metadata by module.

It makes sense to make the PYSAL_PLUS environment as open as possible, as long as things were correctly wrapped in try/except or common.requires. I will write that up in a wiki page, too. I've written this notebook documenting things I've seen & tried.

weikang9009 and others added 27 commits July 16, 2016 12:12
"exta" should have been "extra." once changed, the screen function needed
slight modification to work with the rest of the pattern.
The grid was constructed using np.meshgrid over the range of the bounding box,
with a computed stride. If the range and number of divisions were both integer,
as was the case in the unittest, this generated floor division incorrectly. When
we did initial testing in python3, we thought the unittest was correct. In fact,
the unittest was incorrect, and we needed to enforce float division always.
Note that these comparators are NOT OGC-SPEC.
ljwolf and others added 3 commits July 16, 2016 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants