-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
versioneer does not work properly with setuptools #101
Comments
Doh, this was already fixed in 99d5d93. Could we get a new release that includes this fix? It seems like a major issue. |
With the fix you linked, I get:
When running |
It looks like this relates to #52. For some reason, |
Okay, figured it out. I was doing:
I prefer this style to I'm not sure what the fix is, so I propose updating the docs to warn against the |
+1 on releasing a new versioneer version. I'm having setuptools related versioneer issues too. |
Found another problem! |
+1. Just spent several hours trying to figure out why my static data wasn't included in my wheels |
Five months later and still no 0.16 release? |
So sorry, I've been distracted by other projects. I'll make an 0.16 release with the existing code now. |
@ariscn I think your @ariscn I ran some little test programs with python 2.7.10 and 2.7.11, and didn't see |
Ok, 0.16 is out , and should include this fix. Closing this out. Sorry for the extended delay, folks. |
Versioneer's build_py class inherits from the distutils one, not the setuptools one; this seems to cause problems like wheels not being built with the right contents (I guess because distutils handles MANIFEST.in differently).
There is already code to handle this for the "sdist" command, I think doing the same for "build_py" is the correct thing to do. PR incoming.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: