Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-34861: better cProfile CLI defaults: sort by time, restrict to top 20 #13083

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andreasvc
Copy link

@andreasvc andreasvc commented May 4, 2019

adds option -n to restrict to top n lines (defaults to 20 for CLI)
set default of -s to sort by time (instead of unsorted)
makes "python3 -m cProfile foo.py" directly usable.

https://bugs.python.org/issue34861

adds option -n to restrict to top n lines (defaults to 20 for CLI)
set default of -s to sort by time (instead of unsorted)
"python3 -m cProfile foo.py" directly usable.
@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA (this might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in your b.p.o account settings). This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for your contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@andreasvc andreasvc changed the title BPO-34861: better cProfile CLI defaults: sort by time, restrict to top 20 bpo-34861: better cProfile CLI defaults: sort by time, restrict to top 20 May 4, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@mangrisano mangrisano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for the pull request and for the patience. I've left a couple of comments about the changes.
Just a question: did yo test it? If didn't, please provide it. Thank you.
Furthermore, the Doc and perhaps the docstring should be improved adding the parameter and explaining what it does.

I'm not a core-dev, so feel free to don't follow my tips.


def runctx(statement, globals, locals, filename=None, sort=-1):
def runctx(statement, globals, locals, filename=None, sort=-1,
numresults=None):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please, indent numresults under statement.

@@ -185,7 +190,8 @@ def main():
'__package__': None,
'__cached__': None,
}
runctx(code, globs, None, options.outfile, options.sort)
runctx(code, globs, None, options.outfile, options.sort,
options.numresults)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please, indent options.numresults under code.


def runctx(statement, globals, locals, filename=None, sort=-1):
def runctx(statement, globals, locals, filename=None, sort=-1,
numresults=None):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The same for this row. :)

@@ -605,7 +610,8 @@ def main():
'__package__': None,
'__cached__': None,
}
runctx(code, globs, None, options.outfile, options.sort)
runctx(code, globs, None, options.outfile, options.sort,
options.numresults)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indent options.numresults under code.

Copy link
Contributor

@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that #31929 made the default sort order cumtime. Any interest in merging main and picking this back up?

Copy link
Contributor

@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requesting changes as per above

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@andreasvc
Copy link
Author

@hauntsaninja personally I like time more than cumtime, but if it has been decided that cumtime should be the default, fine. Don't know if I have time to pick this up in the short term, so if anyone else wants to pick it up, by all means!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants