Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.8] bpo-39416: Document some restrictions on the default string representations of numeric classes (GH-18111) #22861

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Oct 21, 2020

[bpo-39416](): Document string representations of the Numeric classes

This is a change to the specification of the Python language.

The idea here is to put sane minimal limits on the Python language's default
representations of its Numeric classes. That way "Marty's Robotic Massage Parlor
and Python Interpreter" implementation of Python won't do anything too
crazy.

Some discussion in the email thread:
Subject: Documenting Python's float.str()
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/FV22TKT3S2Q3P7PNN6MCXI6IX3HRRNAL/
(cherry picked from commit c60394c)

Co-authored-by: kpinc kop@karlpinc.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue39416

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:merwok

…ations of numeric classes (pythonGH-18111)

[bpo-39416](): Document string representations of the Numeric classes

This is a change to the specification of the Python language.

The idea here is to put sane minimal limits on the Python language's default
representations of its Numeric classes.  That way "Marty's Robotic Massage Parlor
and Python Interpreter" implementation of Python won't do anything too
crazy.

Some discussion in the email thread:
Subject: Documenting Python's float.__str__()
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/FV22TKT3S2Q3P7PNN6MCXI6IX3HRRNAL/
(cherry picked from commit c60394c)

Co-authored-by: kpinc <kop@karlpinc.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kpinc: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kpinc: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 89fac4c into python:3.8 Oct 21, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-c60394c-3.8 branch October 21, 2020 18:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants