Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.10] bpo-40982: shutil docs: Remove outdated copytree() example (GH-24778) #32326

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Apr 5, 2022

It is not preferable to keep a copy of the implementation in the
docs.
(cherry picked from commit e06f920)

Co-authored-by: Zackery Spytz zspytz@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue40982

…24778)

It is not preferable to keep a copy of the implementation in the
docs.
(cherry picked from commit e06f920)

Co-authored-by: Zackery Spytz <zspytz@gmail.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ZackerySpytz and @JelleZijlstra: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Apr 5, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ZackerySpytz and @JelleZijlstra: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ZackerySpytz and @JelleZijlstra: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 857cf55 into python:3.10 Apr 5, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-e06f920-3.10 branch April 5, 2022 03:16
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ZackerySpytz and @JelleZijlstra: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants