Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove hacky_wrapper from BackendSelect #49079

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

smessmer
Copy link
Contributor

@smessmer smessmer commented Dec 9, 2020

Stack from ghstack:

BackendSelect kernels have been changed to be written the new way, so this hacky_wrapper here isn't needed anymore.
This PR is not expected to change perf or anything, just simplify the code a bit. The hacky_wrapper here was a no-op and not creating any actual wrappers
because it short-cirtuits to not create a wrapper when there is no wrapper needed.

Differential Revision: D25421633

BackendSelect kernels have been changed to be written the new way, so this hacky_wrapper here isn't needed anymore.
This PR is not expected to change perf or anything, just simplify the code a bit. The hacky_wrapper here was a no-op and not creating any actual wrappers
because it short-cirtuits to not create a wrapper when there is no wrapper needed.

Differential Revision: [D25421633](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D25421633/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 36cccd1 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 7 times.

@smessmer smessmer requested review from ezyang and bhosmer and removed request for ezyang December 9, 2020 16:40
BackendSelect kernels have been changed to be written the new way, so this hacky_wrapper here isn't needed anymore.
This PR is not expected to change perf or anything, just simplify the code a bit. The hacky_wrapper here was a no-op and not creating any actual wrappers
because it short-cirtuits to not create a wrapper when there is no wrapper needed.

Differential Revision: [D25421633](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D25421633/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
BackendSelect kernels have been changed to be written the new way, so this hacky_wrapper here isn't needed anymore.
This PR is not expected to change perf or anything, just simplify the code a bit. The hacky_wrapper here was a no-op and not creating any actual wrappers
because it short-cirtuits to not create a wrapper when there is no wrapper needed.

Differential Revision: [D25421633](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D25421633/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in c892c3a.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/smessmer/278/head branch December 14, 2020 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants