New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate torch.chain_matmul in favor of torch.linalg.multi_dot #53453
Deprecate torch.chain_matmul in favor of torch.linalg.multi_dot #53453
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: c8fe7ef8fae80e9498c7b9b3eaef63851e57bb9b Pull Request resolved: #53453
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 3684278 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
…i_dot" [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: c8fe7ef8fae80e9498c7b9b3eaef63851e57bb9b Pull Request resolved: #53453
…i_dot" [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: a951a581cb5e351665bddb26850b3d844edea304 Pull Request resolved: #53453
…i_dot" [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: 87b18c7ea86acd38e6fea0bc1435aba3c10c9122 Pull Request resolved: #53453
…i_dot" [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: 3838e611caf4627a42fd0379bdc210a3a6175329 Pull Request resolved: #53453
[(2, S), (S, 2), (2, S)], | ||
# Each test case consists of the sizes in the chain of multiplications | ||
# e.g. [2, S, 2, S] generates matrices (2, S) @ (S, 2) @ (2, S) | ||
test_cases = [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How much does this increase test time by? Is the net test time decreased or increased with the chain_matmul() test removal?
…i_dot" [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: ec6db31ce3af029eeb2546e24e5a9721c411c487 Pull Request resolved: #53453
…i_dot" [ghstack-poisoned]
…i_dot" [ghstack-poisoned]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool! Let's get this merged. We can worry about docs refinements in our docs review before the 1.9 release.
…i_dot" [ghstack-poisoned]
Co-authored-by: anjali411 <chourdiaanjali123@gmail.com>
…i_dot" Differential Revision: [D27406282](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D27406282) [ghstack-poisoned]
…i_dot" Differential Revision: [D27406282](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D27406282) [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: f97e541437bac8640db5dfac9e1e6422bede8008 Pull Request resolved: #53453
ACKing |
…i_dot" Differential Revision: [D27406282](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D27406282) [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: 5f1c0927fccf073541730751d9f8308caa7b4b90 Pull Request resolved: #53453
…ting on "Deprecate torch.chain_matmul in favor of torch.linalg.multi_dot" Differential Revision: [D27406282](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D27406282) [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: ef79a827770dc501cefc7a7822b07237ae627a13 Pull Request resolved: #53453
…i_dot" Differential Revision: [D27406282](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D27406282) [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: d031d0af2573dfa330d73d9e91481692a92ae493 Pull Request resolved: #53453
…i_dot" Differential Revision: [D27406282](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D27406282) [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: ea6666b6d52128d9116774ad6ba4b62bb586982b Pull Request resolved: #53453
…i_dot" Differential Revision: [D27406282](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D27406282) [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: b5a98a2ece6e11b3978c71f0ca992b0a3763d826 Pull Request resolved: #53453
…i_dot" Differential Revision: [D27406282](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D27406282) [ghstack-poisoned]
@heitorschueroff merged this pull request in d98072b. |
Stack from ghstack:
Differential Revision: D27406282