-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FSDP] No need for list() in _get_shard #66957
Conversation
chunk appears to return a tuple which is enough given that we just index to the right chunk and discard the rest. Differential Revision: [D31780799](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D31780799/) [ghstack-poisoned]
CI Flow Status⚛️ CI FlowRuleset - Version:
You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands: # ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun
# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slow For more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki. |
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 0961f98 (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks! but could we land these changes after #66904 is landed, so that we have more tests to catch regression?
Yes, will wait for unittest changes to be landed. |
chunk appears to return a tuple which is enough given that we just index to the right chunk and discard the rest. Differential Revision: [D31780799](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D31780799/) [ghstack-poisoned]
chunk appears to return a tuple which is enough given that we just index to the right chunk and discard the rest. Differential Revision: [D31780799](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D31780799/) [ghstack-poisoned]
chunk appears to return a tuple which is enough given that we just index to the right chunk and discard the rest. Differential Revision: [D31780799](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D31780799/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Pull Request resolved: #66957 chunk appears to return a tuple which is enough given that we just index to the right chunk and discard the rest. ghstack-source-id: 141391149 Test Plan: CI Reviewed By: mrshenli Differential Revision: D31780799 fbshipit-source-id: fdb1b77fffa916328e14a4cd692b5241ae46a514
Summary: Pull Request resolved: #66957 chunk appears to return a tuple which is enough given that we just index to the right chunk and discard the rest. ghstack-source-id: 141391149 Test Plan: CI Reviewed By: mrshenli Differential Revision: D31780799 fbshipit-source-id: fdb1b77fffa916328e14a4cd692b5241ae46a514
Stack from ghstack:
chunk appears to return a tuple which is enough given that we just
index to the right chunk and discard the rest.
Differential Revision: D31780799