New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove backward ops for NNPACK spatial convolution #70305
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
CI Flow Status⚛️ CI FlowRuleset - Version:
You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands: # ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun
# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slow For more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki. |
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit d567ee5 (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
@jbschlosser has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Differential Revision: [D33279223](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D33279223) [ghstack-poisoned]
@jbschlosser has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
These backward ops are currently **unused** since the backward pass for NNPACK calls `slow_conv_dilated2d` instead. I decided to leave in the functions (not as ops) since I believe mobile may want to use them in the future, but I could be convinced to remove them entirely instead. Differential Revision: [D33279223](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D33279223) [ghstack-poisoned]
@jbschlosser has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are the functions tested at all? If not they're probably going to bitrot (if they haven't already) so it might be better to remove them entirely. I'm fine with deleting it or keeping it
Nope, not AFAICT. There's one test in I'm happy to remove these functions. If for some reason they're needed in the future, they can be added in then. |
These backward ops are currently **unused** since the backward pass for NNPACK calls `slow_conv_dilated2d` instead. I decided to leave in the functions (not as ops) since I believe mobile may want to use them in the future, but I could be convinced to remove them entirely instead. Differential Revision: [D33279223](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D33279223) [ghstack-poisoned]
ghstack-source-id: 62dbf901ffcd283034fbc3ce3b1b7945bf4e67f8 Pull Request resolved: #70305
@jbschlosser has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Stack from ghstack:
These backward ops are currently unused since the backward pass for NNPACK calls
slow_conv_dilated2d
instead.I decided to leave in the functions (not as ops) since I believe mobile may want to use them in the future, but I could be convinced to remove them entirely instead.
Differential Revision: D33279223