Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip failing tests in test_nn if compiled without LAPACK #70913

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

lithuak
Copy link
Contributor

@lithuak lithuak commented Jan 6, 2022

Fixes #70912

@pytorch-probot
Copy link

pytorch-probot bot commented Jan 6, 2022

CI Flow Status

⚛️ CI Flow

Ruleset - Version: v1
Ruleset - File: https://github.com/lithuak/pytorch/blob/3333c517f82010432f8449e878ded816ff70bc5d/.github/generated-ciflow-ruleset.json
PR ciflow labels: ciflow/default

Workflows Labels (bold enabled) Status
Triggered Workflows
linux-bionic-py3.7-clang9 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/noarch, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-docs ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/docs, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-vulkan-bionic-py3.7-clang9 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk, ciflow/vulkan ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7-bazel-test ciflow/all, ciflow/bazel, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3-clang5-mobile-build ciflow/all, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/mobile, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3-clang5-mobile-custom-build-static ciflow/all, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/mobile, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-clang7-asan ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/sanitizers, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-clang7-onnx ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/onnx, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
pytorch-linux-xenial-py3-clang5-android-ndk-r19c-gradle-custom-build-single ciflow/all, ciflow/android, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
pytorch-linux-xenial-py3-clang5-android-ndk-r19c-gradle-custom-build-single-full-jit ciflow/all, ciflow/android, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
win-vs2019-cpu-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/trunk, ciflow/win ✅ triggered
win-vs2019-cuda11.3-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/default, ciflow/trunk, ciflow/win ✅ triggered
Skipped Workflows
caffe2-linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
docker-builds ciflow/all, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64 ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-coreml ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-custom-ops ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-full-jit ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-metal ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-x86-64 ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-x86-64-coreml ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-x86-64-full-jit ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda10.2-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
linux-bionic-cuda10.2-py3.9-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/slow, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
linux-docs-push ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
macos-10-15-py3-arm64 ciflow/all, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
macos-10-15-py3-lite-interpreter-x86-64 ciflow/all, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
macos-11-py3-x86-64 ciflow/all, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
parallelnative-linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
periodic-libtorch-linux-bionic-cuda11.5-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda11.1-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-bionic-cuda11.5-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-xenial-cuda10.2-py3-gcc7-slow-gradcheck ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled, ciflow/slow, ciflow/slow-gradcheck 🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-xenial-cuda11.1-py3.7-gcc7-debug ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-win-vs2019-cuda11.1-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/scheduled, ciflow/win 🚫 skipped
periodic-win-vs2019-cuda11.5-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/scheduled, ciflow/win 🚫 skipped
pytorch-linux-xenial-py3-clang5-android-ndk-r19c-build ciflow/all, ciflow/android, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped

You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands:
# ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun

# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slow

For more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jan 6, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 3333c51 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@albanD
Copy link
Collaborator

albanD commented Jan 6, 2022

cc @lezcano these tests are important. We should make sure we can run them without Lapack. Should we pick a different set of functions to ensure it is true?

@albanD albanD requested review from lezcano and albanD January 6, 2022 13:29
@albanD albanD added the triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module label Jan 6, 2022
@lithuak
Copy link
Contributor Author

lithuak commented Jan 6, 2022

@albanD I'm new to the codebase, so my proposed fix was just an improvised attempts to make it work.

One small thing that comes to mind - use @skipCPUIfNoLapack instead of @skipIfNoLapack. That would make it a bit more narrow. Not sure it solves the problem though.

@albanD
Copy link
Collaborator

albanD commented Jan 6, 2022

No problem!
We don't have a CI build without LAPACK unfortunately as this is something that is available in the vast majority of cases. So maybe this fix is good since it doesn't change anything on the actual CI.
I just want the opinion from @lezcano on that. You can leave the PR as-is for now.

@lezcano
Copy link
Collaborator

lezcano commented Jan 7, 2022

I agree that we should use a simpler function to test this functionality that does not depend on LAPACK.

I think that this skip is fine for now given that we always use LAPACK in the CI, but it'd be good to at least leave a # FIXME comment over these tests explaining what's going on here.

@albanD
Copy link
Collaborator

albanD commented Jan 7, 2022

Sounds good!
@lithuak could you add the #FIXME comment next the skips please and I'll land that!

@lithuak
Copy link
Contributor Author

lithuak commented Jan 7, 2022

@albanD yep. I think I can also add a github issue listing those tests to be fixed WDYT

@albanD
Copy link
Collaborator

albanD commented Jan 7, 2022

Yes, an issue is even better!

Copy link
Collaborator

@lezcano lezcano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM modulo a very small nit!

test/test_nn.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lithuak lithuak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

started a review by mistake, pls ignore it

Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the update!

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@albanD has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla signed open source triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tests in test_nn fail when compiled without LAPACK support
5 participants