Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved configuration naming for repetitive workflows #7502

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2023

Conversation

DanilBaibak
Copy link
Contributor

Improved configuration naming for repetitive workflows

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 6, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/7502

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 7 Failures

As of commit 7797ee9:

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Copy link
Collaborator

@pmeier pmeier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stamping

@malfet malfet merged commit ce653d8 into main Apr 6, 2023
@malfet malfet deleted the Improve-Naming-for-Retryable-Workflows branch April 6, 2023 14:10
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 6, 2023

Hey @malfet!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added. The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2023
Reviewed By: vmoens

Differential Revision: D45183673

fbshipit-source-id: 1e37655ab6bbec71d62b51d3de3a6f13cf0334b7
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants