Optimize CREFL for memory

[mraspaud]

No description provided.

[djhoese]

@mraspaud iirc you did this with the python version. It still requires quite a bit of memory but should we consider this closable? Or maybe we should leave it open as incentive to rewrite it in cython/C? That way we can benefit from element-wise for-loops like the original C code.

[mraspaud]

Yes I used the python version, and I would like to keep it open for the reason you mention

[mraspaud]

I'm closing this as dask made this much better

[djhoese]

Do we know if crefl actually works right now?

[mraspaud]

nope :)

On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 20:32 David Hoese ***@***.***> wrote: Do we know if crefl actually works right now? — You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#10 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKPeoaeM2R_2q-G-3YERQ4Z_r0RNOUVks5t1FnJgaJpZM4KBRke> .

-- Martin Raspaud, PhD Software engineer SMHI, SE-60176