Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Insert dropped uris in reverse order. #4965

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2017
Merged

Conversation

arnaud-morvan
Copy link
Contributor

As each one is inserted on top of previous,
this result in layers sorted alphabeticaly in layer tree.
Relate with #6828.

Description

Include a few sentences describing the overall goals for this PR (pull request). If applicable also add screenshots.

Checklist

Reviewing is a process done by project maintainers, mostly on a volunteer basis. We try to keep the overhead as small as possible and appreciate if you help us to do so by completing the following items. Feel free to ask in a comment if you have troubles with any of them.

  • Commit messages are descriptive and explain the rationale for changes
  • Commits which fix bugs include fixes #11111 in the commit message next to the description
  • Commits which add new features are tagged with [FEATURE] in the commit message
  • Commits which change the UI or existing user workflows are tagged with [needs-docs] in the commit message and containt sufficient information in the commit message to be documented
  • I have read the QGIS Coding Standards and this PR complies with them
  • This PR passes all existing unit tests (test results will be reported by travis-ci after opening this PR)
  • New unit tests have been added for core changes
  • I have run the scripts/prepare-commit.sh script before each commit

As each one is inserted on top of previous,
this result in layers sorted alphabeticaly in layer tree.
Relate with qgis#6828.
@m-kuhn m-kuhn merged commit 97d168e into qgis:master Aug 12, 2017
@arnaud-morvan arnaud-morvan deleted the drop_order branch August 12, 2017 14:47
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants