Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support multiple validation functions #19

Closed
gregcaporaso opened this issue Mar 10, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

support multiple validation functions #19

gregcaporaso opened this issue Mar 10, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gregcaporaso
Copy link
Member

It will be important for the set of rules that are applied to be customizable. For example, Qiita has different requirements for its sample template and prep template (qiita-spots/qiita#933) than QIIME 1.x has for its mapping files.

What probably makes the most sense for this would be if there were multiple validate functions, which were tool/version-specific (e.g., QIIME 1.9.x, Qiita 0.1.x, ...), and if the user could choose to validate with one or more of these from within the Google Spreadsheets interface.

@gregcaporaso gregcaporaso changed the title support multiple validation types support multiple validation functions Mar 10, 2015
@jairideout
Copy link
Member

Great idea! Ideally this will be fully customizable so that other formats can be supported, and we can provide tool/version-specific validators for QIIME, Qiita, etc. that are pre-configured for users.

@jairideout jairideout self-assigned this Jan 13, 2016
@jairideout jairideout added this to the Additional formats and GUI improvements (alpha) milestone Jan 13, 2016
@jairideout
Copy link
Member

The code is now factored to support multiple validation formats. Closing as we have more specific issues for formats we plan to support.

jairideout pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2016
Top nav-bar side padding now won't overlap (or be too close)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants