New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUG: single ref level string splitting in tabulate viz #116
Merged
Oddant1
merged 12 commits into
qiime2:master
from
lizgehret:single-formula-string-splitting-bug
May 1, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bb1d4d7
bug: single ref level string splitting in tabulate viz
lizgehret 5ede62b
fixed single vs multi ref levels & including defaults in viz
lizgehret b6af6d7
squash
lizgehret d182ec4
tst: adds unit tests
lizgehret 48c3b3f
some unit test debugging
lizgehret b941457
more unit tests & handling multi ref levels w/same column
lizgehret a0bf9bd
even more tests
lizgehret b07c5d6
even MORE unit tests
lizgehret dea877d
todo: adding reminder for handling md column types
lizgehret 3caaee9
addressing @Oddant1 review comments & implementing md column type enf…
lizgehret bd81900
adds working type enforcement for md columns w/associated testing + m…
lizgehret 8d79a75
adding deadman switch for md column types
lizgehret File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since
reference_levels
is a list, and lists are mutable, the valuereference_levels
has after appending on line 81 will also be its value outside of this function. Lists are basically pass-by-reference, not pass-by-value, so mutating the state of a list inside of a function like this and then returning the list is redundant, but it might be worth keeping for clarity.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes sense, thanks @Oddant1 - I think I'll leave it as-is for clarity's sake, unless @ebolyen thinks it's unnecessary?