Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Would be nice to support Python 3 #108

Open
lookfwd opened this issue Jan 10, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Would be nice to support Python 3 #108

lookfwd opened this issue Jan 10, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement question

Comments

@lookfwd
Copy link
Contributor

lookfwd commented Jan 10, 2016

Would be nice to support Python 3 (now that it's still young because later it will be extra messy). I think I can try to contribute something in this area.
@sfranky
Copy link
Collaborator

sfranky commented Jan 10, 2016

will we be able to make do without conditional/branched code? (do we care..?)

sebinbash pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2023
feat!: migrate from python 2 to python 3, fix a few bugs (see #108)
595a0d7 
BREAKING CHANGE: python 2.x is no longer supported

- Modify print statements
- Change izip to zip, xrange to range, etc.
- Remove legacy implementations of OrderedDict, namedtuple and Counter

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schnorbus <sebastian.schnorbus@hpe.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@lookfwd @sfranky @fgeorgatos