New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix combinePointwise precision on discrete pointsets #2514
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: d4dbda3 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 4 Ignored Deployments
|
Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?
|
So... webpack is failing, and I have no idea why. It doesn't fail for me on localhost. Might be different node versions or a bug in turborepo caches. Tbh this makes me want to remove webpack; we've been shipping components bundle on NPM, but that's not a common practice, usually package consumers do that themselves. Webpack bundle was useful for Observable, but:
One useful thing with webpack that I used occasionally was webpack-bundle-analyzer, but rollup-plugin-visualizer can replace it. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2514 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 71.55% 71.74% +0.18%
==========================================
Files 113 113
Lines 5927 5952 +25
Branches 1179 1182 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 4241 4270 +29
+ Misses 1678 1674 -4
Partials 8 8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
continuous: f, | ||
discrete: 0, | ||
}; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why the change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's just a coding style change, I usually don't do this unless I want to do other changes, but here I thought I'll make them and then forgot about it.
From https://github.com/quantified-uncertainty/squiggle/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md:
Prefer
function
keyword over arrow functions in top scope, use arrow functions otherwise
(trivial to do in VS Code, btw, Cmd+.
-> "Convert to named function".)
Were you on the right playground with "Next" version? |
|
Happy for this to be merged whenever it passes build+tests. |
Fixes #2336.