We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Description of the issue See https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq/actions/runs/5578431373/jobs/10192635623?pr=6198
=========================== short test summary info =========================== FAILED cirq-google/cirq_google/calibration/engine_simulator_test.py::test_with_random_gaussian_sqrt_iswap_simulates_correctly - assert False + where False = <function allclose_up_to_global_phase at 0x0000014D69BA5AB0>(array([ 0. +0.0000000e+00j, 0. +0.0000000e+00j, 0. +0.0000000e+00j, -0.34968054-3.7625067e-02j,... -1.2306079e-02j, 0. +0.0000000e+00j, 0. +0.0000000e+00j, 0. +0.0000000e+00j], dtype=complex64), array([ 0.0000000e+00+0.j , 0.0000000e+00+0.j , 0.0000000e+00+0.j , -3.7625063e-02+0.3496805j ,...e-02-0.34322196j, 0.0000000e+00+0.j , 0.0000000e+00+0.j , 0.0000000e+00+0.j ], dtype=complex64)) + where <function allclose_up_to_global_phase at 0x0000014D69BA5AB0> = cirq.allclose_up_to_global_phase = 1 failed, 20167 passed, 207 skipped, 92 xfailed, 527 warnings in 786.30s (0:13:06) =
Fix should probably to increase accuracy to np.complex128 or reduce atol ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Description of the issue
See https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq/actions/runs/5578431373/jobs/10192635623?pr=6198
Fix should probably to increase accuracy to np.complex128 or reduce atol ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: