Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce global logging properties #536

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2024
Merged

Introduce global logging properties #536

merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

geoand
Copy link
Collaborator

@geoand geoand commented May 2, 2024

This allows us to use quarkus.langchain4j.log-requests=true instead of specifying needing to specify the provider as well

@geoand geoand requested a review from a team as a code owner May 2, 2024 16:22
@jmartisk
Copy link
Collaborator

jmartisk commented May 3, 2024

Great idea!
There's a failure in a watsonx test that seems related

@geoand
Copy link
Collaborator Author

geoand commented May 3, 2024

Right, I'll fix it soon

This allows us to use quarkus.langchain4j.log-requests=true
instead of specifying needing to specify the provider
as well
@jmartisk
Copy link
Collaborator

jmartisk commented May 3, 2024

I think it would also be nice to mention it on the Getting started page in the docs

@geoand
Copy link
Collaborator Author

geoand commented May 3, 2024

Having it in the docs definitely makes sense, but I am not sure which page you are referring to.

@jmartisk
Copy link
Collaborator

jmartisk commented May 3, 2024

@geoand
Copy link
Collaborator Author

geoand commented May 3, 2024

Would you like to push a commit with that change?

@jmartisk
Copy link
Collaborator

jmartisk commented May 3, 2024

Sure

@geoand
Copy link
Collaborator Author

geoand commented May 3, 2024

🙏🏼

@maxandersen
Copy link
Member

Bedt feature ever ! (At least this morning thus far).

@jmartisk jmartisk merged commit 283def9 into main May 3, 2024
12 checks passed
@jmartisk jmartisk deleted the global-properties branch May 3, 2024 07:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants