Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add @Cache annotation to resteasy-reactive #17630

Closed
andreas-eberle opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #17644
Closed

Add @Cache annotation to resteasy-reactive #17630

andreas-eberle opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #17644
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@andreas-eberle
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Resteasy supports the @Cache and @NoCache annotations for GET resources. These annoations allow it to easily add the Cache-Control headers to GET calls so the client can know if and how long to cache a response. See https://docs.jboss.org/resteasy/docs/4.6.0.Final/userguide/html/Cache_NoCache_CacheControl.html.

Unfortunately, resteasy-reactive does contain these annotations. Can you add them there as well?

@andreas-eberle andreas-eberle added the kind/enhancement New feature or request label Jun 2, 2021
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Jun 2, 2021

/cc @FroMage, @geoand, @gwenneg, @stuartwdouglas

@gwenneg gwenneg removed the area/cache label Jun 2, 2021
@geoand geoand self-assigned this Jun 2, 2021
geoand added a commit to geoand/quarkus that referenced this issue Jun 2, 2021
geoand added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2021
Add support for @Cache and @nocache in RESTEasy Reactive
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 2.1 - main milestone Jun 3, 2021
@gsmet gsmet modified the milestones: 2.1 - main, 2.0.0.CR3 Jun 3, 2021
gsmet pushed a commit to gsmet/quarkus that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants