Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Save a small amount of allocations during init #17180

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 13, 2021

Conversation

geoand
Copy link
Contributor

@geoand geoand commented May 12, 2021

This is done by using the known size of the List parameters of recorders

@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented May 12, 2021

This workflow status is outdated as a new workflow run has been triggered.

Failing Jobs - Building 22c6b70

Status Name Step Test failures Logs Raw logs
JVM Tests - JDK 11 Build Test failures Logs Raw logs
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 16
MicroProfile TCKs Tests Verify Test failures Logs Raw logs

Full information is available in the Build summary check run.

Test Failures

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 11 #

📦 extensions/resteasy-classic/resteasy/deployment

io.quarkus.resteasy.test.ReadTimeoutTestCase.testReadTimesOut line 47 - More details - Source on GitHub


⚙️ MicroProfile TCKs Tests #

📦 tcks/microprofile-openapi

org.eclipse.microprofile.openapi.tck.OASConfigExcludePackageTest.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

📦 tcks/microprofile-opentracing/base

org.eclipse.microprofile.opentracing.tck.ClientRegistrarTests.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

org.eclipse.microprofile.opentracing.tck.OpenTracingClassMethodNameClientTests.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

org.eclipse.microprofile.opentracing.tck.OpenTracingDefaultClientTests.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

org.eclipse.microprofile.opentracing.tck.OpenTracingHTTPPathNameTests.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

org.eclipse.microprofile.opentracing.tck.OpenTracingSkipPatternTests.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented May 12, 2021

This workflow status is outdated as a new workflow run has been triggered.

Failing Jobs - Building 22c6b70

Status Name Step Test failures Logs Raw logs
MicroProfile TCKs Tests Verify Test failures Logs Raw logs

Full information is available in the Build summary check run.

Test Failures

⚙️ MicroProfile TCKs Tests #

📦 tcks/microprofile-openapi

org.eclipse.microprofile.openapi.tck.OASConfigExcludePackageTest.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

📦 tcks/microprofile-opentracing/base

org.eclipse.microprofile.opentracing.tck.ClientRegistrarTests.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

org.eclipse.microprofile.opentracing.tck.OpenTracingClassMethodNameClientTests.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

org.eclipse.microprofile.opentracing.tck.OpenTracingDefaultClientTests.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

org.eclipse.microprofile.opentracing.tck.OpenTracingHTTPPathNameTests.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

org.eclipse.microprofile.opentracing.tck.OpenTracingSkipPatternTests.arquillianBeforeClass - More details - Source on GitHub

This is done by using the known size of the List parameters of recorders
@geoand geoand added the triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes label May 13, 2021
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented May 13, 2021

Failing Jobs - Building 0a2f136

Status Name Step Test failures Logs Raw logs
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 11
JVM Tests - JDK 11 Windows Build Test failures Logs Raw logs
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 16

Full information is available in the Build summary check run.

Test Failures

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 11 Windows #

📦 integration-tests/resteasy-reactive-rest-client

io.quarkus.it.rest.client.BasicTest.shouldWork line 30 - More details - Source on GitHub

@geoand geoand merged commit 06b140e into quarkusio:main May 13, 2021
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot removed the triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes label May 13, 2021
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 2.0 - main milestone May 13, 2021
@geoand geoand deleted the recorder-polish branch May 13, 2021 08:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants