RESTEasy Reactive - Prefer application-supplied provider over a pre-packaged one #28041
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Thanks for this, but I have a fundamental question: Do we really need the new field? Why can we not rely on |
michalvavrik
force-pushed
the
feature/fix-msg-body-write-injection
branch
from
a9796c3
to
84ba3ee
Compare
|
@geoand I went over usage of |
geoand
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2022
|
Thanks! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
michalvavrik
force-pushed
the
feature/fix-msg-body-write-injection
branch
from
84ba3ee
to
5fe49d8
Compare
gsmet
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes: #28040
Message body readers/writers defined with
@Providerare preferred over providers from class path (META-INF/services/).