Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow JSON serialization customization in ORM #35113

Conversation

marko-bekhta
Copy link
Contributor

@marko-bekhta marko-bekhta commented Jul 31, 2023

  • add @JsonFormat/@XmlFormat annotations to apply to custom FormatMapper implementations for JSON/XML formatting (must also use @PersistenceUnitExtension)
  • use a Quarkus-configured FormatMapping if Jackson/JSONB/Jaxb is present, and the user did not specify a format mapper

Closes: #32029

@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Jul 31, 2023

/cc @Sanne (hibernate-orm), @gsmet (hibernate-orm), @yrodiere (hibernate-orm)

@Sanne Sanne force-pushed the feat/i32029-orm-add-json-format-mapper-config branch from 5d3e509 to add9361 Compare July 31, 2023 15:30
@quarkus-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@marko-bekhta marko-bekhta force-pushed the feat/i32029-orm-add-json-format-mapper-config branch from add9361 to 7762919 Compare July 31, 2023 16:01
Copy link
Member

@yrodiere yrodiere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, but I wonder why we're going through a configuration property when we could just use CDI? I.e. like we do for interceptors.

Also I'd advise against configuration properties that refer to class names, that'll put us in a difficult position if we ever end up allowing to point to a CDI bean through configuration properties. Hibernate Search supports that, but it requires some infrastructure that I'm not sure ORM provides at the moment (see https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/search/reference/en-US/html_single/#configuration-bean-reference-parsing).

@marko-bekhta
Copy link
Contributor Author

but I wonder why we're going through a configuration property when we could just use CDI?

IDK 🤷🏻 🤷🏻‍♂️ 🤷🏻‍♀️ 😆 I'm probably just more used to config properties than to configuring things through beans 😃. So if we'd go with CDI.. then it would looks something like:

InjectableInstance<FormatMapper> formatMapper = PersistenceUnitUtil.singleExtensionInstanceForPersistenceUnit(
        FormatMapper.class, persistenceUnitName);
if (!formatMapper.isUnsatisfied()) {
    descriptor.getProperties().put(AvailableSettings.JSON_FORMAT_MAPPER, formatMapper.get());
}

and then the user would do:

@PersistenceUnitExtension("some-pu")
public class SomePuFormatMapper implements FormatMapper {
// ...
}

But since this FormatMapper is used for both JSON and XML formatters in ORM... should we create JsonFormatMapper and XmlFormatMapper and expect users to implement these so we'd know to which property to attach the formatter to? Or is there some other means to distinguish them ... (BTW, we should probably go ahead and add the same thing for XML while we are at it, no?)

@quarkus-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@geoand
Copy link
Contributor

geoand commented Aug 1, 2023

This looks good, but I wonder why we're going through a configuration property when we could just use CDI? I.e. like we do for interceptors.

+1 for this - it also makes for a consistent user experience

Also I'd advise against configuration properties that refer to class names

Very very true

Copy link
Member

@yrodiere yrodiere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a comment below about something I didn't spot earlier.

But since this FormatMapper is used for both JSON and XML formatters in ORM... should we create JsonFormatMapper and XmlFormatMapper and expect users to implement these so we'd know to which property to attach the formatter to?

FormatMapper is an ORM interface, so I wouldn't extend it.

You may be able to introduce additional CDI qualifiers, such as @Json and @Xml, and pick the mapper based on that? And default to an object mapper without any of these qualifiers.

I wonder if there is already something like this for e.g. RestEasy, @geoand? I'd rather have these qualifiers defined in some serialization-related module than in the Hibernate ORM extension, if possible...

BTW, we should probably go ahead and add the same thing for XML while we are at it, no?

Probably, if it works, including in native mode.

@geoand
Copy link
Contributor

geoand commented Aug 2, 2023

You may be able to introduce additional CDI qualifiers, such as @JSON and @xml, and pick the mapper based on that? And default to an object mapper without any of these qualifiers.

We don't have such qualifiers anywhere AFAIK.

I wonder if there is already something like this for e.g. RestEasy, @geoand? I'd rather have these qualifiers defined in some serialization-related module than in the Hibernate ORM extension, if possible...

We had talked about for RESTEasy Reactive, but it never materialized (not least because there are other ways to do this in RESTEasy Reactive)

@yrodiere
Copy link
Member

yrodiere commented Aug 2, 2023

We had talked about for RESTEasy Reactive, but it never materialized (not least because there are other ways to do this in RESTEasy Reactive)

Ok, so now might be the time. There's no obvious place to put these annotations in, though... I can think of two approaches:

  1. Put them in the core (e.g. core/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkus/runtime/serialization) with rather generic names such as @Json and @Xml, so that they can be shared among multiple extension. Though for now only Hibernate ORM would use them.
  2. Put them in the Hibernate ORM extension with more specific names such as @JsonFormat and @XmlFormat, to use them only with Hibernate ORM. Though we might need to go through a deprecation cycle if we add more generic annotations later.

I'd tend to favor 2 since there doesn't seem to be much momentum to add similar annotations for RestEasy. WDYT?

@geoand
Copy link
Contributor

geoand commented Aug 2, 2023

I agree with going for 2 for now - best to be cautious for starters and expand in the future if we see it makes sense.

@Sanne
Copy link
Member

Sanne commented Aug 2, 2023

I'd also prefet option 2, as it might not be a good idea to dictate a format that necessarily applies to multiple layers: there might be some need to map the same object differently in the DB than in other external representations, as one would typically update one service at a time.

@yrodiere
Copy link
Member

yrodiere commented Aug 2, 2023

I'd also prefet option 2, as it might not be a good idea to dictate a format that necessarily applies to multiple layers: there might be some need to map the same object differently in the DB than in other external representations, as one would typically update one service at a time.

Sure, but having a common @Json/@Xml qualifier does not necessary lead to that problem. Object mappers would be annotated with other qualifiers on top of @Json/@Xml. For ORM we need @PersistenceUnitExtension anyway, those for Resteasy we'd have another, resteasy-specific qualifier. At least that's how I envisoned it.

Anyway, let's forget about a common @Json/@Xml, we're not there yet.

@marko-bekhta , to sum up the consensus seems to be that if you add support for XML FormatMappers, you should add @JsonFormat and @XmlFormat CDI qualifiers in the Hibernate ORM extension to distinguish between JSON and XML ObjectMappers. Those qualifiers would be understood by the Hibernate ORM extension only.

@marko-bekhta
Copy link
Contributor Author

This will need the next release of ORM to make options.applyJsonFormatMapper and options.applyXmlFormatMapper available. So I've converted this PR to a draft. But otherwise, it works.

@quarkus-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@marko-bekhta marko-bekhta force-pushed the feat/i32029-orm-add-json-format-mapper-config branch from 2939682 to 120bd07 Compare September 21, 2023 07:18
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 21, 2023

🙈 The PR is closed and the preview is expired.

@marko-bekhta marko-bekhta force-pushed the feat/i32029-orm-add-json-format-mapper-config branch from 120bd07 to b580d5f Compare October 5, 2023 15:26
@yrodiere yrodiere marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2023 13:19
@quarkus-bot

This comment has been minimized.

- add qualifiers to mark FormatMapper for JSON/XML formatting
- use a Quarkus-configured ObjectMapper if Jackson is present and user did not specify a format mapper
- use a Quarkus-configured Jsonb if Jsonb is present and user did not specify a format mapper
@yrodiere yrodiere force-pushed the feat/i32029-orm-add-json-format-mapper-config branch from b580d5f to 47ecd0a Compare November 22, 2023 10:13
@yrodiere
Copy link
Member

This will need the next release of ORM to make options.applyJsonFormatMapper and options.applyXmlFormatMapper available. So I've converted this PR to a draft. But otherwise, it works.

Rebasing and marking as ready for review since we're now using a version of ORM that exposes these two options.

Copy link
Member

@yrodiere yrodiere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks.

@geoand maybe you'll want to have a look at the changes to the JSON extensions?

Quarkus Documentation automation moved this from To do to Reviewer approved Nov 22, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@geoand geoand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lovely!

@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2023

Failing Jobs - Building 47ecd0a

Status Name Step Failures Logs Raw logs Build scan
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 11 🔍
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 17 🔍
JVM Tests - JDK 21 Build Failures Logs Raw logs 🔍

You can also consult the Develocity build scans.

Failures

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 21 #

- Failing: integration-tests/container-image/maven-invoker-way 

📦 integration-tests/container-image/maven-invoker-way

Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-invoker-plugin:3.6.0:run (integration-tests) on project quarkus-integration-test-container-image-invoker: 1 build failed. See console output above for details.

@yrodiere
Copy link
Member

Build failure is unrelated:

2023-11-22T13:06:49.5498841Z [INFO] [ERROR] Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: com.google.cloud.tools.jib.http.ResponseException: 500 Internal Server Error
2023-11-22T13:06:49.5505141Z [INFO] [ERROR] GET https://registry.access.redhat.com/v2/ubi8/openjdk-11-runtime/blobs/sha256:9c3f7aec4e3ecbaf95a7953bd9dd6ba23d3e79fc54441e70f3d090e374f59c79
2023-11-22T13:06:49.5509538Z [INFO] [ERROR] <html>
2023-11-22T13:06:49.5512257Z [INFO] [ERROR]   <head>
2023-11-22T13:06:49.5513371Z [INFO] [ERROR]     <title>Internal Server Error</title>
2023-11-22T13:06:49.5515480Z [INFO] [ERROR]   </head>
2023-11-22T13:06:49.5516506Z [INFO] [ERROR]   <body>
2023-11-22T13:06:49.5517809Z [INFO] [ERROR]     <h1><p>Internal Server Error</p></h1>
2023-11-22T13:06:49.5518705Z [INFO] [ERROR]     
2023-11-22T13:06:49.5519665Z [INFO] [ERROR]   </body>
2023-11-22T13:06:49.5520554Z [INFO] [ERROR] </html>

@yrodiere yrodiere merged commit 5f85934 into quarkusio:main Nov 22, 2023
53 of 54 checks passed
Quarkus Documentation automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Done Nov 22, 2023
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added kind/enhancement New feature or request and removed triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes labels Nov 22, 2023
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 3.7 - main milestone Nov 22, 2023
@yrodiere
Copy link
Member

@marko-bekhta Merged, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use default ObjectMapper in FormatMappers Configuration for Hibernate ORM's JSONType
4 participants