Bump com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt from 9.31 to 9.34

[dependabot]

Bumps com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt from 9.31 to 9.34.

Changelog

Sourced from com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt's changelog.

version 1.0 (2012-03-01)

• First version based on the OpenInfoCard JWT, JWS and JWE code base.

version 1.1 (2012-03-06)

• Introduces type-safe enumeration of the JSON Web Algorithms (JWA).
• Refactors the JWT class.

version 1.2 (2012-03-08)

• Moves JWS and JWE code into separate classes.

version 1.3 (2012-03-09)

• Switches to Apache Commons Codec for Base64URL encoding and decoding
• Consolidates the crypto utilities within the package.
• Introduces a JWT content serialiser class.

version 1.4 (2012-03-09)

• Refactoring of JWT class and JUnit tests.

version 1.5 (2012-03-18)

• Switches to JSON Smart for JSON serialisation and parsing.
• Introduces claims set class with JSON objects, string, Base64URL and byte array views.

version 1.6 (2012-03-20)

• Creates class for representing, serialising and parsing JSON Web Keys (JWK).
• Introduces separate class for representing JWT headers.

version 1.7 (2012-04-01)

• Introduces separate classes for plain, JWS and JWE headers.
• Introduces separate classes for plain, signed and encrypted JWTs.
• Removes the JWTContent class.
• Removes password-based (PE820) encryption support.

version 1.8 (2012-04-03)

• Adds support for the ZIP JWE header parameter.
• Removes unsupported algorithms from the JWA enumeration.

version 1.9 (2012-04-03)

• Renames JWEHeader.{get|set}EncryptionAlgorithm() to JWEHeader.{get|set}EncryptionMethod().

version 1.9.1 (2012-04-03)

• Upgrades JSON Smart JAR to 1.1.1.

version 1.10 (2012-04-14)

• Introduces serialize() method to base abstract JWT class.

version 1.11 (2012-05-13)

• JWT.serialize() throws checked JWTException instead of

... (truncated)

Commits

• 973bdbe make use of HeaderValidation ensureDisjoint method with any protected JOSE he...
• 53792e7 add the 'join' method to the Header class
• 3fd0a94 fix Header parsing
• a284f9d make use of JWEHeader without alg defined
• 97c6b06 Add a getAlgorithmAndEnsureNotNull method to the BaseJWEProvider class
• 4be0990 Merged in iss517-4 (pull request #108)
• 7833d5e Moves the static getAlgorithmAndEnsureNotNull from BaseJWEProvider to a dedic...
• e3b3b31 Adds JavaDoc note JWEHeader.Builder.Builder(EncryptionMethod) is intended for...
• 0ada4db Adds missing JavaDocs to BaseJWEProvider.getCEK and isCEKProvided
• 37ecae5 Updates JavaDoc overview.html with JWEObjectJSON reference
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[quarkus-bot]

✖ This workflow run has failed but no jobs reported an error. Something weird happened, please check the workflow run page carefully: it might be an issue with the workflow configuration itself.