New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more tests for GenericExporter vs APT comparison #109

Closed
timowest opened this Issue Mar 7, 2012 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@timowest
Member

timowest commented Mar 7, 2012

Add more tests for GenericExporter vs APT comparison

timowest added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2012

timowest added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2012

@timowest

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@timowest

timowest Mar 10, 2012

Member

GenericExporter creates now almost identical Q-types, when configured correctly.

The differences are related to the following aspects:

  • No projection support in GenericExporter
  • No delegate support in GenericExporter
  • slightly different behaviour with generic wildcards
Member

timowest commented Mar 10, 2012

GenericExporter creates now almost identical Q-types, when configured correctly.

The differences are related to the following aspects:

  • No projection support in GenericExporter
  • No delegate support in GenericExporter
  • slightly different behaviour with generic wildcards
@timowest

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@timowest

timowest Mar 11, 2012

Member

released in 2.3.3

Member

timowest commented Mar 11, 2012

released in 2.3.3

@timowest timowest closed this Mar 11, 2012

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment