We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
it seems for me that expect(sut).to.beFalse() is more human-readable than expect(sut).toNot.beTrue(), @modocache what do you think?
expect(sut).to.beFalse()
expect(sut).toNot.beTrue()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yep! More matchers! 👍
Sorry, something went wrong.
Will take this one too
Fixed in #51.
Merge pull request Quick#47 from jeffh/failure-reporting
67f20e4
Updated failure message style
No branches or pull requests
it seems for me that
expect(sut).to.beFalse()
is more human-readable thanexpect(sut).toNot.beTrue()
,@modocache what do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: