-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switch to big endian #28
Comments
I started an email thread to confirm the consensus. Deadline Jan 6, 2017. |
@janaiyengar please don't close design issues, we need to complete the call for consensus. |
Ah, apologies. I thought we had already wrapped up the consensus call -- I merged the PR, which automagically closed the issue. I'm happy to revert the (now merged) PR if consensus changes. |
As @martinthomson just noted in email, the consensus call has ended. Will send email to the group now. |
We had consensus in Seoul (which we should reconfirm on the list) about switching from little endian to big endian. This should probably happen in concert with the version number scheme that @martinthomson and @janaiyengar are hashing out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: