Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ben Kaduk's Transport Comment 36 #4648

Closed
LPardue opened this issue Jan 7, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4686
Closed

Ben Kaduk's Transport Comment 36 #4648

LPardue opened this issue Jan 7, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4686
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.

Comments

@LPardue
Copy link
Member

LPardue commented Jan 7, 2021

@kaduk said:

Section 20.1

TRANSPORT_PARAMETER_ERROR (0x8): An endpoint received transport
parameters that were badly formatted, included an invalid value,
was absent even though it is mandatory, was present though it is
forbidden, or is otherwise in error.

(nit) maybe some singluar/plural mismatch here, though the RFC Editor
would probably have a better suggested fix than I could come up with.

@LPardue LPardue added -transport iesg An issue raised during IESG review. labels Jan 7, 2021
@LPardue LPardue added this to the transport-iesg milestone Jan 7, 2021
@martinthomson martinthomson added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label Jan 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants