-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Split PTO calculation into a dedicated method #3681
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
290a511
Split PTO calculation into a dedicated method
ianswett d0050a0
Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
ianswett 65b036d
Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
ianswett 2630bfd
Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
ianswett 83727ca
Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
ianswett f10875e
Fix errors
ianswett 242e38d
Apply suggestions from code review
ianswett 7a33021
Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
ianswett 6ce4f9b
Marten's suggestions
ianswett 820497e
Merge branch 'master' into ianswett-split-pto-pseudocode
ianswett 8295012
Add an assert
ianswett 92c2e22
Apply suggestions from code review
ianswett File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Assuming this is for the amplification protection, something's missing here. Perhaps this should be
if (is_client && no packets in flight && !PeerCompletedAddressValidation())
.Otherwise, you never get into the case below on line 1293.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added an assert that for !PeerCompletedAddressValidation().
I think the condition you're mentioning is:
"if (no in-flight packets in space):
continue;"
That's per PN-space, not for the connection as a whole.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
never mind, I thought the code below to do the early return when no packets are in flight after address validation was removed. It's still there, so all good.