Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Defer the definitions of closing and draining states #3865

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2020

Conversation

martinthomson
Copy link
Member

Rather than putting these at the top of the section, they work fine being at the end. Updating references was not so onerous either.

@martinthomson martinthomson added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -transport labels Jul 8, 2020
@martinthomson martinthomson linked an issue Jul 8, 2020 that may be closed by this pull request
@martinthomson
Copy link
Member Author

Mike notes that there is some duplication in the subsections here. This is a simple move for the moment; we can remove redundancies as a separate step.

Copy link
Contributor

@MikeBishop MikeBishop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm okay with deferring that step, but would prefer not to lose the feedback.

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member Author

#3907 opened for that.

@martinthomson martinthomson merged commit 4284ad9 into master Jul 16, 2020
@martinthomson martinthomson deleted the later-closing-draining branch July 16, 2020 04:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Defer the definition of closing and draining states
2 participants