Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tradeoffs in the persistent congestion threshold #4215

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Oct 15, 2020

Conversation

janaiyengar
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #4195.

Copy link
Contributor

@ianswett ianswett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A suggestion

draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@gloinul gloinul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thinks this resolve my issue, but would prefer Ian's proposal.

draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
janaiyengar and others added 2 commits October 15, 2020 12:57
Co-authored-by: ianswett <ianswett@users.noreply.github.com>
@janaiyengar janaiyengar merged commit 3a9655e into master Oct 15, 2020
@janaiyengar janaiyengar deleted the jri/congestion-threshold branch October 15, 2020 20:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Recovery-31: Limits on kPersistentCongestionThreshold values?
3 participants