Hack for using correct workflow in package name validation

[fiskus]

I couldn't fix this the right way, so I just mocked schema loading behavior, because when the workflow has a schema for JSON validation, then the workflow is correct

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2375 (59f839b) into master (b4a1dfb) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2375      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   43.61%   43.58%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         497      497              
  Lines       23972    23987      +15     
  Branches     3128     3131       +3     
==========================================
  Hits        10455    10455              
- Misses      12699    12714      +15     
  Partials      818      818              

Flag	Coverage Δ
api-python	90.27% <ø> (ø)
catalog	14.34% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
lambda	93.87% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
catalog/app/containers/Bucket/PackageCopyDialog.js	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...iners/Bucket/PackageDialog/PackageCreationForm.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...g/app/containers/Bucket/PackageDirectoryDialog.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b4a1dfb...59f839b. Read the comment docs.

[nl0]

ok, this will do