Only register the first web-dispatch listener #3021
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The problem: on certain double IPv4 and IPv6 environments, web-dispatch
will start a single listener (for management for example) but will
register two listeners in the Rabbit Mnesia table. Later, RabbitMQ
will crash when trying to stop or suspend them (rabbitmq-upgrade drain)
because only one of the two listeners exist in Ranch.
The fix: we register only the first listener, because that's the one
we used to create the Ranch ref (see rabbit_networking:ranch_ref/1).
Types of Changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to this project?
Put an
x
in the boxes that applyChecklist
Put an
x
in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creatingthe PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask on the
mailing list. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are
going to look for before merging your code.
CONTRIBUTING.md
documentFurther Comments
Present in at least 3.8.11, tested on Windows.
@dumbbell is all over the
git blame
for the original implementation so a review would be great. Also I am not sure this is the right fix, I am wondering if it worked before and if perhaps something else broke it. Or perhaps the drain command did not exist at the time.RabbitMQ and Ranch disagreeing on what listeners are available:
25672 is the distribution so it's expected that it's not in Ranch. 5672 has two in both cases. 15672 has one in Ranch and two in RabbitMQ: this is the problem.