Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Expose effective policy definition via CLI #6556

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Dec 2, 2022
Merged

Expose effective policy definition via CLI #6556

merged 2 commits into from Dec 2, 2022

Conversation

binarin
Copy link
Contributor

@binarin binarin commented Dec 2, 2022

Proposed Changes

Now it's only visible in the management UI.

One can craft a series of calls to rabbitmqctl list_queues and rabbitmqctl list_policies to achieve similiar result. But it's more difficult, and also doesn't take operator policy (if any) into account.

Types of Changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes issue #NNNN)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause an observable behavior change in existing systems)
  • Documentation improvements (corrections, new content, etc)
  • Cosmetic change (whitespace, formatting, etc)
  • Build system and/or CI

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document
  • I have signed the CA (see https://cla.pivotal.io/sign/rabbitmq)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • All tests pass locally with my changes
  • If relevant, I have added necessary documentation to https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-website
  • If relevant, I have added this change to the first version(s) in release-notes that I expect to introduce it

binarin and others added 2 commits December 2, 2022 17:06
@binarin
Expose effective policy definition via CLI
398f072 
Now it's only visible in the management UI.

One can craft a series of calls to `rabbitmqctl list_queues` and
`rabbitmqctl list_policies` to achieve similiar result. But it's more
difficult, and also doesn't take operator policy (if any) into account.
@michaelklishin
rabbitmqctl(8): wording
93bac75
@michaelklishin michaelklishin added this to the 3.11.5 milestone Dec 2, 2022
@michaelklishin michaelklishin merged commit e2f5dc6 into main Dec 2, 2022
@michaelklishin michaelklishin deleted the effective-policy-definition-in-cli branch December 2, 2022 23:38
@michaelklishin
Copy link
Member

@Mergifyio backport v3.11.x v3.10.x v3.9.x

This was referenced Dec 2, 2022
Merged
Merged
Merged
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Dec 2, 2022

backport v3.11.x v3.10.x v3.9.x

✅ Backports have been created

michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2022
@michaelklishin
Merge pull request #6559 from rabbitmq/mergify/bp/v3.9.x/pr-6556
c14f2ad 
Expose effective policy definition via CLI (backport #6556)
michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2022
@michaelklishin
Merge pull request #6558 from rabbitmq/mergify/bp/v3.10.x/pr-6556
de37e79 
Expose effective policy definition via CLI (backport #6556)
michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2022
@michaelklishin
Merge pull request #6557 from rabbitmq/mergify/bp/v3.11.x/pr-6556
5322e9d 
Expose effective policy definition via CLI (backport #6556)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@michaelklishin michaelklishin michaelklishin approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.11.5
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@binarin @michaelklishin